MossaicBook a demo
← All process examples

Planning and management example

Demand has changed. The plan needs a decision.

Bring changing demand, available supply and operating constraints into a shared review. Make the options and assumptions clear before an agreed plan is published.

Illustrative scenario. It demonstrates coordination around a planning decision, not a supplied forecasting model or a guaranteed business outcome.

The situation

A decision in the middle of the work.

In this example, demand rises against the current plan. The planning owner needs to compare allocation, expedite and backorder choices, using the business's own priorities and available planning tools.

What starts it
A demand change or scheduled review shows that the current operating plan needs attention.
Who owns the choice
Planning owner
What about the ordinary path?

A review may confirm that the current plan still holds. The process can record that decision and its next review point without manufacturing an exception.

How this example works

From the first signal to the recorded result.

Each step has a purpose, a responsible role and an observable next state.

  1. Notice

    The current plan needs another look.

    Register the changed demand signal or start the scheduled planning review.

    Planning cycle

  2. Assemble

    Bring demand, supply and constraints together.

    Use the relevant records and planning tools. AI can summarise the change and make scenario assumptions easier to inspect.

    Connected records, planning tools and AI assistance

  3. Compare

    Make the tradeoffs explicit.

    Compare prepared options against the business's constraints and priorities. Flag uncertain inputs.

    Configured checks and planning tools

  4. Decide

    The planning owner selects the way forward.

    Accept a scenario, request another option or wait for an assumption to be checked.

    Planning owner

  5. Carry through

    Publish the decision and assign the actions.

    Track the plan update and the acknowledgements required from the responsible teams.

    Planning system and operating teams

  6. Review

    Keep the plan ready for the next change.

    Retain the selected version, assumptions, decision and next review point.

    Planning process record

The facts behind the next step

Give the decision its context.

Sources and assumptions should be inspectable where they matter to the choice.

What changed?
The difference between current demand and the assumptions used in the existing plan.
What constrains the response?
Stock, capacity, supply commitments and the service priorities agreed by the business.
Which choices are available?
Prepared allocation, expedite or backorder scenarios, with their assumptions and consequences visible.

Human authority

The planning owner chooses the tradeoff.

The planner can select a scenario, ask for another comparison or hold the decision while an important assumption is checked. The choice and its rationale remain with the plan.

Illustrative decision packet

Review a revised allocation scenario.

The demand change creates a choice about stock, service priorities and cost. The planner needs to see the assumptions and consequences before selecting a route.

Information for the reviewer

  • The changed demand signal and the current plan
  • Available stock and expected supply
  • Capacity and supplier commitments
  • Scenario assumptions, constraints and service priorities

A prepared recommendation does not itself give permission to act.

After the decision

Carry the agreed steps through.

Track the required result. An instruction sent is not yet a confirmed update.

  • Agreed plan

    Publish the accepted version and the assumptions that support it to the intended planning step.

  • Assigned work

    Pass the resulting actions to the responsible teams, with the decision and required acknowledgement.

  • Next review

    Keep unresolved assumptions and the next review point visible as new information arrives.

For a real implementation

Establish the details in your context.

  • Forecasting, optimisation and scenario calculation use the tools and models agreed for the implementation.
  • The illustration does not promise an included planning engine, a specific data provider or a mathematically optimal plan.
  • A plan can be agreed while real-world execution remains ongoing.

Useful questions for the conversation

  • What decision is the review meant to support?
  • Which assumptions or constraints change the choice?
  • Who agrees the plan, who acts on it and what should trigger another review?
Implementation and trust questions

About this illustration.

Is this a real customer deployment?

Illustrative scenario. It demonstrates coordination around a planning decision, not a supplied forecasting model or a guaranteed business outcome.

What happens while the process waits?

Flag the assumption, seek confirmation and show which decision depends on it. If the business permits a provisional plan, record that choice explicitly rather than presenting the input as confirmed.

What counts as complete in this example?

The selected plan, assumptions and required action acknowledgements are recorded. Publishing a plan completes this coordination cycle; achieving its service, cost or supply targets still depends on the operation that follows.

Other shapes of work

From the illustration to your work

Your process may need a different route.

Bring a process you want to improve. We’ll explore its steps, decisions and systems with you.

Let's discuss your process